Juveniles' names should not be published

October 3, 2013

I agree with Bill O'Connor's recommendation in the Sept. 27 edition that the Cape Gazette refrain from naming juvenile suspects under the age of 18 "and exposing highly vulnerable children to undue and potentially harsh public notoriety."

The three suspects in the article at hand are charged with a truly horrendous attack on an 80-year-old woman and there is no doubt that the community needs to know about this. The community benefits as well from the psychiatric report which described one of the suspect's totally failed family environment because it helps explain how something like this can happen.

The Cape editor's note makes these points which Bill never challenged. The central question Bill raised is: what important public good is served by naming these juveniles?

The editor's note failed to address this central question and instead noted that they waited until the police report where they were named and arrested.  This satisfies the journalists requirement for accuracy, but still does not address Bill's central recommendation in which I concur.

Mac McMahon

  • A letter to the editor expresses a reader's opinion and, as such, is not reflective of the editorial opinions of this newspaper.

    To submit a letter to the editor for publishing, send an email to Letters must be signed and include a telephone number for verification. Please keep letters to 650 words or fewer.  We reserve the right to edit for content and length.

Welcome to The Cape Gazette Archive.
This content is provided free of charge
thanks to our sponsor:

Close ad in...

Close Ad