News Briefs
Calendar
Classifieds
Editorial
Obituaries
Police Report
Reference/Links
Sports

Archives
E-edition

Ad Rates
Announcements
Contact Us
Feedback
Subscribe

Arts/Entertainment
Building Permits
Business
Community
Education
Health
Help Wanted
Letters to the Editor
Marriages
Movie Reviews
Parks
Property Transfers
Rentals
Saltwater Portraits
Site Map
Steppin' Out
Tourist Info
Weather
Worship
Yard Sales

CapeGazette.com - Covering Delaware's Cape Region | 302.645.7700
.
Cape Gazette
.
Fri, Jan 4, 2008

Justice Department rules in favor
of Dewey Beach in FOIA complaint

By Ryan Mavity
Cape Gazette staff

Dewey Beach did not violate the Freedom of Information Act in providing public notice for town council meetings regarding the Ruddertowne development project, the Delaware Department of Justice finds.

On July 24 and 25, Ellen Danaher of Dewey filed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) complaints against the town, alleging that Dewey officials did not provide adequate notice about the building height of the Ruddertowne development proposal and did not provide the public with updated draft copies of the town’s comprehensive plan.

On the issue of public meetings, Danaher said the town did not post adequate notice of meetings held on May 11, May 24, June 8, June 15, June 22 and June 29 in the Cape Region’s two newspapers, the Cape Gazette and the Coast Press. Danaher also said the notices did not accurately disclose what would be discussed at the meetings, specifically, building height requirements for the proposed Ruddertowne project.

However, the town stated it had posted notice of the meetings at Town Hall, the town council’s primary office. FOIA requires a public body to post notices of meetings at its primary office and on this basis justice officials said the town’s notice was sufficient. The town is not required by FOIA to post notice in local newspapers or on the town website, the latter of which is done as a courtesy to citizens and is encouraged, but not required by FOIA.

In regards to Danaher’s other claim, that the subject of the agendas was not accurately disclosed, justice officials said FOIA requires the town to give notice of what matters it intends to discuss but not to specify every subject that could arise.

Danaher also alleged that the town violated the public records requirements of FOIA by not posting the most complete, recent draft of the comprehensive plan on the town website. However, the town contended that FOIA does not require them to maintain electronic copies of records on the town website and that when Danaher came to Town Hall to get the most recent copies, they were given to her. Once again, justice officials sided with the town.

Both Brady and Danaher could not be reached for comment.

Contact Ryan Mavity at ryanm@capegazette.com

.
Comment    |    To top  
.
E-EDITION
Login
E-editionE-edition GateawayE-edition Example
Your ad here
Cape Gazette Archives
Beach Paper Information
Delmarva map
Ready.gov
Official PayPal Seal