Share: 

How does Sussex measure progress?

September 17, 2021

A wave of voices across Sussex County have spoken loudly through editorials, conversations and planning authority hearings. From all accounts, there is a disconnect in how each of us interprets betterment. Perhaps the important question is this. How do we each gauge progress? Webster’s Dictionary defines progress as: “1. A gradual betterment. 2. To develop a more advanced stage; improve.”

Given burgeoning numbers of subdivisions cramped onto small plats, escalating traffic, and overburdened infrastructure, we need to decide if this exemplifies progress. And further, we need to ask why the rising dissatisfaction is being ignored by the decision-makers.

Clearly, residents and landowners, struggling with the harried scope of approvals and attendant congestion, must wonder if we are better off than before. Certainly, mowing down forests and paving over marshlands are clearly at cross-purposes with storm protection and environmental concerns. And what about the loss of rural tranquility of Sussex County? Where does that fit on the scale of progress? Are we satisfied with a transformation into a place we hardly recognize?

We are at the juncture where our common paths are diverging. There is a small group of those both elected and appointed charged with keeping the welfare of the majority in mind when making evaluations on their behalf. Perhaps the decision-makers are unclear as to how they should measure progress.

Simply and rapidly approving proposed projects is not a valid definition of beneficial improvement when the short-term consequences are overwhelmed roads, sprawling communities, and degradation of protective wetlands and woodlands. Simply dismissing the science of flooding and saltwater intrusion is plainly dangerous in the longterm. No longer should we accept the burrowing beneath bureaucratic blather.

The developers will move on, and we will be left with the responsibility for increasing healthcare facilities and providers, seeing to faster response times, and reordering evacuation routes. While none of that is a bad idea, how fast can we keep up the pace? In other words, collectively, we need to ask the big questions. Where’s the oversight? Why rushed decisions?

Sussex County residents understand the rights of farmers and other landowners to benefit from the use or sale of their land. And developers have the right to profit while providing jobs. We all accept development is coming. But there are routes to compromise, putting that land to better use. And that must be explored.

A beginning would be to expect well-thought-out decisions. Just maybe the gauge of betterment begins with accountability. Lastly, the Sussex County Comprehensive Plan should be the road map to progress. It was developed with public input and based on Sussex code.

But unless it is reviewed and revised so that conflict and ambiguity are addressed, the document casts shadows on such rulings. The people of Sussex County must decide which is your path to progress, then make your voices heard with the strength of conviction.

Janice Hurff
Lewes
  • A letter to the editor expresses a reader's opinion and, as such, is not reflective of the editorial opinions of this newspaper.

    To submit a letter to the editor for publishing, send an email to newsroom@capegazette.com. Letters must be signed and include a telephone number and address for verification. Please keep letters to 500 words or fewer. We reserve the right to edit for content and length. Letters should be responsive to issues addressed in the Cape Gazette rather than content from other publications or media. Only one letter per author will be published every 30 days. Letters restating information and opinions already offered by the same author will not be used. Letters must focus on issues of general, local concern, not personalities or specific businesses.

Subscribe to the CapeGazette.com Daily Newsletter