While a data-driven approach is a valid way for researchers to assess many situations, one has to look at the methodology researchers use to gather that data. A flawed methodology will clearly lead to flawed data which will then lead to a flawed conclusion. Simply placing traffic count monitors, or people in lawn chairs, to assess the flow of traffic ignores critical traffic-flow factors that further enhance the challenges faced here in the Five Points region.
What research method better predicts the outcome? A string of machine data about traffic count and frequency, or listening to the locals who live this on a daily basis? Traffic count is just one factor, but what data is being collected on the experience of drivers, both new and well-seasoned?
What data is being gathered on the reaction time of drivers across this broad spectrum of experience? What data is being gathered on the vehicle types, which can range from compact cars to large trucks with trailers that take up more space than allotted within the median crossover areas?
What data is gathered on the wait time at crossovers when trying to head northbound on Route 1? What data is collected regarding the speeds of those that are supposed to drive 55mph from Route 16 to the Nassau Bridge and those that are doing 70mph or above in this same stretch of roadway? What data is gathered regarding nighttime driving factors when oncoming headlights can impact visual acuity and depth perception? What data is gathered on those texting or talking on their phones (and not using a hands-free system) in this stretch of highway?
The data gathered on accidents or fatalities that occur in this stretch seem irrelevant unless a certain threshold is reached. Any accident is one too many. While data regarding traffic patterns can be of benefit, it is only one of many factors that must be considered. The failure of the researchers to “listen” to the local community results in incomplete data and a flawed research methodology that will, ultimately, result in flawed decisions. We witness this every day with the Sussex County Planning and Zoning Commission members who continue to ignore calls to first match infrastructure improvements before making decisions on responsible growth.
The local residents live this traffic nightmare on a daily basis, and their input should be reflected in any data set. I would encourage Secretary Cohan to experience what we live and listen to the residents rather than rely solely on incomplete and flawed data to drive her decisions.
Marc Anderson
Lewes
-
A letter to the editor expresses a reader's opinion and, as such, is not reflective of the editorial opinions of this newspaper.
To submit a letter to the editor for publishing, send an email to newsroom@capegazette.com. Letters must be signed and include a telephone number and address for verification. Please keep letters to 500 words or fewer. We reserve the right to edit for content and length. Letters should be responsive to issues addressed in the Cape Gazette rather than content from other publications or media. Only one letter per author will be published every 30 days. Letters restating information and opinions already offered by the same author will not be used. Letters must focus on issues of general, local concern, not personalities or specific businesses.
