Related Stories
Investigator, former employees testify in McGuiness trial
Monday, June 27, 2022
Former chief of staff: Auditor’s actions ‘made me uncomfortable’
Thursday, June 23, 2022
McGuiness daughter takes the stand
Wednesday, June 22, 2022
Former auditor’s office employees share work experience
Thursday, June 16, 2022
Witnesses in McGuiness trial testify about state email monitoring
Wednesday, June 15, 2022
McGuiness trial begins in Dover
Tuesday, June 14, 2022
Former employee sues Office of Auditor of Accounts
Wednesday, June 8, 2022
McGuiness case going to Kent County grand jury
Wednesday, June 1, 2022
State Auditor Kathy McGuiness’ trial delayed
Tuesday, May 31, 2022
Laptop evidence mostly allowed in McGuiness case
Tuesday, May 24, 2022
#aoao
A request by State Auditor Kathleen McGuiness to have an intimidation charge against her dropped is in the hands of the court.
McGuiness, who was indicted by a grand jury in October on five counts including felony theft, conflict of interest and official misconduct, filed a motion March 11 in New Castle County Superior Court asking Judge William C. Carpenter Jr. to dismiss the act of intimidation offense filed against her by the Division of Civil Rights and Public Trust under Attorney General Kathleen Jennings.
In McGuiness’s motion, her attorney Steven Wood asks that the intimidation charge be dropped because it provides insufficient notice, does not effectively preclude subsequent prosecution for the same offense, and is fatally deficient.
The division contends that McGuiness’s motion is wrong.
“To the contrary, her indictment provides abundant detail of the charges against her – far more than is required by the law,” the state responds. “It further includes several specific facts, found by the grand jury, in support of the act of intimidation charges – also not required in an indictment.”
The indictment states that after whistleblowers in the Office of Auditor of Accounts expressed concerns about misconduct within the office, McGuiness surveilled their emails and enacted office policies to limit the personal activities of some employees.
“Act of intimidation merely requires the state to show that the defendant knowingly and with malice took some action to prevent or dissuade cooperation,” the motion reads. “The indictment currently alleges these elements, and alleges multiple actions taken by the defendant to satisfy those elements.”
Carpenter is expected to hear oral arguments on the motions Thursday, April 7.
Most Popular
-
(5,359)
Dewey police arrest two on gun, drug...
-
(4,882)
Sussex spends $5 million on land...
-
(4,790)
Cheesesteaks reign at the beach
-
(4,759)
Kaan’s Bakery cuts ribbon on Rehoboth...
-
(4,694)
Pair arrested for drug charges in...
-
(4,617)
Inmate dies at Sussex Correctional...
-
(4,554)
25th annual Running of the Bull takes...
-
(4,273)
DelDOT wants input on new trails plan
-
(3,531)
Rehoboth’s Bright House Hotel in the...
-
(3,407)
Orwen Lorenzo Morris, loved by many