As Delaware’s coastal communities face intensifying storms, rising tides and overburdened drainage systems, many residents are asking what can be done – and at what cost. The answer may already be growing quietly along our streets and backyards. Trees are among the most effective, most cost‑efficient and most underutilized stormwater tools available. It is time we begin treating them as critical public infrastructure.
A 2023 meta‑analysis of 92 peer‑reviewed studies found that trees provide the strongest runoff protection of any land use, outperforming grass, bare soil and other vegetation across climate zones. Trees reduce stormwater through canopy interception, evapotranspiration and root infiltration – capturing rainfall before it hits the ground, returning water to the atmosphere and increasing soil permeability so water moves downward instead of flooding streets and drains.
Another 2023 review identified traits that maximize these benefits – high leaf area index, dense crowns and multi‑leader canopies – giving planners guidance for selecting effective species. A paired‑catchment study further quantified these effects: a single street tree retained an average of 1,684 gallons of stormwater per growing season, measured by tracking increased runoff after trees were removed across 42 storms.
Trees are also a fiscal bargain. Engineered stormwater systems carry high capital and maintenance costs. A 2024 modeling study using the SWMM‑Canopy framework found that street trees deliver more runoff reduction per dollar spent than bioretention facilities; in one case, achieving a 1% reduction in annual runoff required $3.4 million less investment in trees. The U.S. EPA notes that trees reduce stormwater entering combined sewer systems and can defer or eliminate the need for expensive pipe expansion. For fast‑growing coastal towns, these avoided costs matter: Every gallon kept out of the drainage system reduces strain on aging infrastructure and stretches limited municipal budgets.
The benefits extend beyond flood mitigation. Trees cool neighborhoods, filter pollutants, provide wildlife habitat, improve air quality and raise property values. Yet Sussex County has lost about 43,000 acres of woodland over the past 25 years. Coastal communities facing saltwater intrusion and heavier rainfall cannot afford to keep losing trees faster than we plant them.
I urge local planners and legislators to treat tree preservation and strategic planting as frontline stormwater management. Residents can help by planting native trees and speaking up when mature trees are threatened. The evidence is clear: Trees work. And they work better than almost anything else we can build.
Cheryl Winston
Millsboro
A letter to the editor expresses a reader's opinion and, as such, is not reflective of the editorial opinions of this newspaper.
To submit a letter to the editor for publishing, send an email to viewpoints@capegazette.com. All letters are considered at the discretion of the newsroom and published as space allows. Due to the large volume of submissions, we cannot acknowledge receipt of each submission. Letters must include a phone number and address for verification. Keep letters to 400 words or fewer. We reserve the right to edit for content or length. Letters should be responsive to issues addressed in the Cape Gazette rather than content from other publications or media. Letters should focus on local issues, not national topics or personalities. Only one letter per author will be published every 30 days regarding a particular topic. Authors may submit a second letter within that time period if it pertains to a different issue. Letters may not be critical of personalities or specific businesses. Criticism of public figures is permissible. Endorsement letters for political candidates are no longer accepted. Letters must be the author’s original work, and may not be generated by artificial intelligence tools. Templates, form letters and letters containing language similar to other submissions will not be published.





