Share: 

Why grant a massive windfall to the very rich?

November 14, 2017

On Thursday night, Oct. 19, the Republican-controlled Senate passed a budget measure that cuts Medicaid by $1 trillion and Medicare by $500 billion, so that millionaires and corporations can get a tax cut.

Like the walking dead, trickle-down economic theory keeps raising its head and slouching forward, even though it's been thoroughly discredited by the inequality and immiseration that results each time it's implemented.

What trickles down is austerity for the many while the obscene wealth of those at the very top of the economic scale grows exponentially. Some of this obscene wealth gets distributed to the politicians, who then show their fealty to their big money sponsors with votes like the one on Thursday night.

The vote was on a budget resolution that is non-binding, but it opens the door to begin a reconciliation process with Republicans in the House, which means the GOP can go for a tax bill without a single Democratic vote. As Sen. Jeff Merkley said, "In what world does it make sense to rob trillions from the national treasury, all to grant a massive windfall to the very richest individuals?"

And, as Lord Acton famously wrote, "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely."

Michael Lawton
Ocean View

  • A letter to the editor expresses a reader's opinion and, as such, is not reflective of the editorial opinions of this newspaper.

    To submit a letter to the editor for publishing, send an email to viewpoints@capegazette.com. All letters are considered at the discretion of the newsroom and published as space allows. Due to the large volume of submissions, we cannot acknowledge receipt of each submission. Letters must include a phone number and address for verification. Keep letters to 400 words or fewer. We reserve the right to edit for content or length. Letters should be responsive to issues addressed in the Cape Gazette rather than content from other publications or media. Letters should focus on local issues, not national topics or personalities. Only one letter per author will be published every 30 days regarding a particular topic. Authors may submit a second letter within that time period if it pertains to a different issue. Letters may not be critical of personalities or specific businesses. Criticism of public figures is permissible. Endorsement letters for political candidates are no longer accepted. Letters must be the author’s original work, and may not be generated by artificial intelligence tools. Templates, form letters and letters containing language similar to other submissions will not be published.