In his election campaign, Sen. Ernie Lopez promised: "To always place public interests above any special or private interest." Ernie is a man of his word. In his recent vote for House Bill 35, which requires background checks for private gun sales, Ernie made a courageous decision to help protect the public by adding another impediment to criminals attempting to buy guns, while not preventing law-abiding citizens from such purchases. It was a reasonable and responsible vote. It was a vote for common sense and common good. How can anyone argue against background checks to protect us all?
It was not an easy vote. The NRA, of which Ernie is a member, opposes virtually all legislation regulating gun sales. It is a very powerful lobby. Ernie's own party and caucus did not support his position. Ernie resisted the pressure and voted for us all. As a former Republican legislator in the Delaware House of Representatives, I know how difficult it is to stand against that kind of pressure. Ernie will take a lot of criticism; but, hopefully, standing up for what's right and on principle still matters.
Thank you Ernie for looking out for our interests instead of special interests.
Bill Poulterer
Lewes
-
A letter to the editor expresses a reader's opinion and, as such, is not reflective of the editorial opinions of this newspaper.
To submit a letter to the editor for publishing, send an email to viewpoints@capegazette.com. All letters are considered at the discretion of the newsroom and published as space allows. Due to the large volume of submissions, we cannot acknowledge receipt of each submission. Letters must include a phone number and address for verification. Keep letters to 400 words or fewer. We reserve the right to edit for content or length. Letters should be responsive to issues addressed in the Cape Gazette rather than content from other publications or media. Letters should focus on local issues, not national topics or personalities. Only one letter per author will be published every 30 days regarding a particular topic. Authors may submit a second letter within that time period if it pertains to a different issue. Letters may not be critical of personalities or specific businesses. Criticism of public figures is permissible. Endorsement letters for political candidates are no longer accepted. Letters must be the author’s original work, and may not be generated by artificial intelligence tools. Templates, form letters and letters containing language similar to other submissions will not be published.
