Atlantic Fields is the wrong project in the wrong place for eastern Sussex County, and local leaders should reject it for the sake of safety, livability and long‑term planning. While many residents would welcome more convenient shopping options, this proposal goes far beyond meeting local needs and instead turns an already-stressed corridor into a regional retail destination with permanent consequences.
The Route 24 corridor is already struggling with congestion, long backups and frequent crashes, especially during peak seasons and commute hours. Adding a massive shopping center anchored by big‑box retailers would funnel tens of thousands of additional vehicle trips each day through the same choke points that residents, school buses and emergency vehicles must use, making routine travel slower and more dangerous.
Beyond traffic, the sheer intensity of Atlantic Fields is out of scale with surrounding neighborhoods, schools and sensitive environmental areas. A regional‑draw, 600,000‑plus-square‑foot complex does not function like a neighborhood shopping center; it fundamentally changes the character of the area and locks in land‑use conflicts that no set of turn lanes or façade treatments can resolve.
The environmental risks also deserve more attention than they are getting in the rush to tout tax receipts and construction jobs. Building a massive, paved, lit and heavily trafficked site near wellhead protection areas and relying on complex stormwater systems creates long‑term vulnerabilities that will be borne by residents long after any ribbon‑cutting photo ops are forgotten.
Proponents emphasize retail jobs and added tax base, but those benefits must be weighed against the permanent public costs of congestion, road wear, emergency response and degraded quality of life. Eastern Sussex County needs thoughtful, appropriately scaled growth that complements existing communities, not a regional retail hub dropped onto an already-overburdened corridor simply because the land is available.
Residents are not saying no to all growth; they are asking for smarter growth that respects the comprehensive plan, transportation capacity and environmental realities. Local officials should listen carefully to that message and have the courage to say that Atlantic Fields, as proposed, goes too far and does not serve the long‑term interests of the community.
-
A letter to the editor expresses a reader's opinion and, as such, is not reflective of the editorial opinions of this newspaper.
To submit a letter to the editor for publishing, send an email to viewpoints@capegazette.com. All letters are considered at the discretion of the newsroom and published as space allows. Due to the large volume of submissions, we cannot acknowledge receipt of each submission. Letters must include a phone number and address for verification. Keep letters to 400 words or fewer. We reserve the right to edit for content or length. Letters should be responsive to issues addressed in the Cape Gazette rather than content from other publications or media. Letters should focus on local issues, not national topics or personalities. Only one letter per author will be published every 30 days regarding a particular topic. Authors may submit a second letter within that time period if it pertains to a different issue. Letters may not be critical of personalities or specific businesses. Criticism of public figures is permissible. Endorsement letters for political candidates are no longer accepted. Letters must be the author’s original work, and may not be generated by artificial intelligence tools. Templates, form letters and letters containing language similar to other submissions will not be published.
