Share: 

Sussex needs adequate public facilities ordinance

January 20, 2026

The draw of low taxes and low crime for people from cities all over the country has created a building boom here that is intensifying annually.

The county desperately needs to stop evading the enacting of an adequate public facilities ordinance immediately, as Kent and New Castle have successfully, to coordinate growth with infrastructure.

The developers, mostly from out of town, flock here to avoid the restrictions and improvement costs they are subjected to, and needs that an APFO would mandate. Their profits due to that fact are tremendous. Greed to the utmost.

With a APFO …

1. Developers are responsible for the adequate infrastructure to support the project

2. Schools, health, road and traffic needs to be completed first instead of the cart-before-the-horse strategy at present

3. Adherence to and improved setbacks, buffers and practical distances from roadway

4. Recognize the effect on natural habitats, air, water and quality of life.

A health-before-wealth common-sense mandate.

Of course the powers that be will continue to suspiciously refuse this solution.

Jerry LaForgia
Lewes 
  • A letter to the editor expresses a reader's opinion and, as such, is not reflective of the editorial opinions of this newspaper.

    To submit a letter to the editor for publishing, send an email to viewpoints@capegazette.com. All letters are considered at the discretion of the newsroom and published as space allows. Due to the large volume of submissions, we cannot acknowledge receipt of each submission. Letters must include a phone number and address for verification. Keep letters to 400 words or fewer. We reserve the right to edit for content or length. Letters should be responsive to issues addressed in the Cape Gazette rather than content from other publications or media. Letters should focus on local issues, not national topics or personalities. Only one letter per author will be published every 30 days regarding a particular topic. Authors may submit a second letter within that time period if it pertains to a different issue. Letters may not be critical of personalities or specific businesses. Criticism of public figures is permissible. Endorsement letters for political candidates are no longer accepted. Letters must be the author’s original work, and may not be generated by artificial intelligence tools. Templates, form letters and letters containing language similar to other submissions will not be published.