This spring, the U.S. Department of Agriculture asked every state to provide updated information on SNAP recipients so it could correct long-standing errors and ensure food assistance reaches the families who truly depend on it. Twenty-nine states complied. Their cooperation uncovered payments going to more than 186,000 deceased individuals and more than 500,000 duplicate cases, dollars that could instead support living, legitimate families in need.
Delaware has refused to provide this information. In fact, Delaware has even joined a multi-state lawsuit arguing the request is overly broad and burdensome, despite the fact that 29 states have complied. As a result, food assistance for about 119,000 Delawareans may be halted as early as this week.
What stands out is not only the refusal itself, but also the lack of any public explanation from the two officials responsible for this decision: Gov. Matt Meyer and Attorney General Kathleen Jennings. SNAP is fully funded with federal dollars and the federal government already has the underlying data; what it is requesting is timely verification of the data to cross reference for potential fraud or misuse, as was uncovered in the states that did provide the data. Delaware has had months to comply, yet our leaders have chosen refusal and silence.
This raises an unavoidable question: Why would Meyer risk the food security of so many households in need rather than just submit routine updates that nearly every other state has provided without pushback?
Some have speculated that Delaware’s refusal is meant to protect undocumented immigrants. That explanation does not hold, as the USDA already has access to immigration-status information through other existing federal systems, and SNAP confidentiality rules expressly prohibit using program data for immigration enforcement. Providing updated records does not place undocumented families at risk, nor does it grant the federal government any new authority it does not already have.
If that is not the reason, then what is? What would updated information reveal that our state prefers to keep unseen? Would it show administrative fiscal mismanagement that has accumulated after more than 20 years of one-party control? Would it finally bring to light persistent concerns about the accuracy of Delaware’s voter rolls? What are they trying to avoid?
If there is a compelling reason for Delaware to risk losing nearly $200 million in food assistance for our needy families, then Meyer and Jennings should explain it clearly. If no such reason exists, then Delaware should promptly comply.
-
A letter to the editor expresses a reader's opinion and, as such, is not reflective of the editorial opinions of this newspaper.
To submit a letter to the editor for publishing, send an email to viewpoints@capegazette.com. All letters are considered at the discretion of the newsroom and published as space allows. Due to the large volume of submissions, we cannot acknowledge receipt of each submission. Letters must include a phone number and address for verification. Keep letters to 400 words or fewer. We reserve the right to edit for content or length. Letters should be responsive to issues addressed in the Cape Gazette rather than content from other publications or media. Letters should focus on local issues, not national topics or personalities. Only one letter per author will be published every 30 days regarding a particular topic. Authors may submit a second letter within that time period if it pertains to a different issue. Letters may not be critical of personalities or specific businesses. Criticism of public figures is permissible. Endorsement letters for political candidates are no longer accepted. Letters must be the author’s original work, and may not be generated by artificial intelligence tools. Templates, form letters and letters containing language similar to other submissions will not be published.
