I live in Osprey Point and wish to express my unwavering support for the proposed waterfront dining and recreation facility. Recently, Sussex County Council deliberated on an appeal related to this project, during which both proponents and opponents had their say. In my humble opinion, some of those opposing the project seemed to fall back on the all-too-familiar not-in-my-backyard refrain, which tends to emerge once one has established roots in a community.
Critics voiced concerns about potential environmental harm and disruption to the waterway, but interestingly, many of them already own homes and docks along the creek. Some raised valid worries about possible traffic and congestion on Old Landing Road, while others pointed out how this development would with full certainty lead to reduced traffic, decreased overall fuel consumption and less parking congestion along Route 1 and in the downtown beach areas.
Shouldn't we prioritize addressing possible traffic and congestion issues for the few over guaranteed reductions for the many on a road and in a downtown area that are both in dire need of solutions? Sussex County Council now has an extraordinary opportunity to showcase its commitment to environmental stewardship and forward-thinking leadership. They can take proactive steps, such as mandating the dock be exclusively used for electric-powered propulsion, eliminating concerns about refueling, spills and noise pollution.
Additionally, council could consider asking DelDOT to reduce the speed limit on Old Landing Road to 35 mph and encourage the use of low-speed vehicles to access a family-friendly waterfront complex. Implementing limited parking, insisting on a zero-emission structure, disallowing outdoor music and imposing other conditions to create a role-model establishment should also be part of the discussion.
Instead of a simple yes-or-no decision, the council should be asking, "How can we make this happen?" and "What can we do to improve the lives of Sussex County residents and visitors while maximizing our positive impact on the environment?" This project presents an excellent opportunity to strike a balance between development and environmental responsibility, and I hope the council seizes it.
-
A letter to the editor expresses a reader's opinion and, as such, is not reflective of the editorial opinions of this newspaper.
To submit a letter to the editor for publishing, send an email to viewpoints@capegazette.com. All letters are considered at the discretion of the newsroom and published as space allows. Due to the large volume of submissions, we cannot acknowledge receipt of each submission. Letters must include a phone number and address for verification. Keep letters to 400 words or fewer. We reserve the right to edit for content or length. Letters should be responsive to issues addressed in the Cape Gazette rather than content from other publications or media. Letters should focus on local issues, not national topics or personalities. Only one letter per author will be published every 30 days regarding a particular topic. Authors may submit a second letter within that time period if it pertains to a different issue. Letters may not be critical of personalities or specific businesses. Criticism of public figures is permissible. Endorsement letters for political candidates are no longer accepted. Letters must be the author’s original work, and may not be generated by artificial intelligence tools. Templates, form letters and letters containing language similar to other submissions will not be published.
